d20 Rethought: New Trick Subsystem?

A recent hangup in my work on the Avatar RPG has led me to an idea for an alternate bending sub-mechanic that I may well use for all kinds of Tricks in d20 Rethought in general. The reason for this is that it winds up providing the overall system with a curious flexibility regarding which kinds of interaction a given GM/designer wants the system to focus on- combat, social interaction, magic, etc.

This advantage is enough to override my concerns about the disadvantage this subsytem would bring; namely, a loss of elegance due to it deviating from the core mechanic. How bad is this deviation, you ask? well, the mechanic's about half a step away from being a die pool. (GASP)

First, say that any Trick (i.e. any base effect) has an associated "Trick DC". Trick DCs will work on a different scale than normal DCs, because rather than making an normal check you make an unmodified, exploding* die roll that may or may not use a different kind of die. If the initial roll fails, you have a number of rerolls available equal to the number of relevant feats you've taken- "relevant" meaning they pertain to your particular skill or subskill. Once you roll high enough, you can spend the unused rerolls to upgrade your Trick's result beyond the base effect.

So let's say, hypothetically, that have a Wallrun acrobatics trick that lets me run up or along vertical surfaces for short distances. The base effect lets me move 5 feet upwards or (with a 10-foot running start) 10 feet horizontally with no decrease in my move speed. Each upgrade can be spent to make another 5 ft. of vertical or horizontal movement (limit 2), or to make a jump check perpendicular to the wall with a small penalty (no limit, but penalty on jump check stacks). Wallrun has a fairly easy Trick DC; if we assume that in this particular system Trick Dice are d10s, then the DC would probably be 4. So if I have a pool of 3 Acrobatics trick dice total, and my first roll is a success (it gets a result of 4 or higher), that leaves me with 2 "dice" to spend on upgrades, meaning I could run horizontally along a wall for a length of 20 ft. before having to drop or grab hold of something, or run 15 ft. horizontally and then jump away.

Now, how does this afford an rpg system the "curious flexibility" I was talking about earlier? Let's look at the Avatar RPG for an example. In this RPG each of the four types of "bending" (elemental control) has more feats than a single character could possibly take. At a high level, you could feasibly have 10 bending feats and thus a pool of 10 dice, letting you significantly upgrade the effectiveness of your basic moves and reliably pull of advanced moves with a Trick DC of 8 or 9. Meanwhile, the Manipulation skill probably has only a single 3-feat chain associated, providing a number of basic moves with low Trick DCs. So I can invest a small part of my character into being socially manipulative, and have as many as 4 trick dice on hand when using my small array of Manipulation Tricks. If a splatbook full of social interaction feats comes out, suddenly I can instead play a character who's 100% focused on becoming a master social puppeteer. At high levels this character will instead have a full 10 Trick dice on hand and a large array of Manipulation tricks.

In other words, the "power" of a given area of expertise depends on how much the character can invest in it. A single Acrobatics feat chain allows for moves on par with a real-life le parkour runner. Introduce more acrobatics feat chains and you can have a character who vaults and tumbles through the air like they're in the Matrix- but only if they invest a corresponding amount of their own ability, keeping things balanced. A GM who wants their game to focus on kung-fu action rather than politics can just advise players that the majority of the encounters in this game will be resolved with kung-fu battles and that investing too much unrelated feat chains probably won't pay off.

Though I can't yet speak for d20 Rethought, I know that in the Avatar RPG bending attacks will involve first rolling your Trick Dice and then making a normal check to attack your opponent with said effect. This approach is necessary because it's the best way to allow the attacker create an attack that's extra-effective against a given type of defense, before the target chooses whether to defend and how they'll do it.

As always, thoughts and feedback are appreciated.

*: Whenever an exploding die gets the maximum result, you reroll and add a number equal to 1 less than that result. Roll a 6 on a d6, and you reroll and add 5. The end result is that an exploding die can theoretically get any result, no matter how high, so long as you keep getting the maximum result on your die roll.

Read all

Avatar RPG: Combat System Musings

Just an attempt on my part to explain several aspects of how I see the tactics of combat working in this system I'm putting together. Those of you who've been following my work on d20 Rethought will find alot of familiar material here, and as such the same will be true to a lesser degree for anyone who's familiar with the d20 system in general.

Item 1: Character position and range
I'm thinking that this rpg won't invest a great deal of effort into tracking character's locations respective to one another. A rough grid of ten-foot square, where characters that are in close combat share a single square, sounds like it ought to be workable. A long-range duel would be a little less dangerous because participants are investing some of their skill into making their attacks long-range enough to reach the enemy, rather than into making the attacks deal more damage. Meanwhile, a melee-range bending duel could be made to match the fast pace seen in the show if you make Buildup actions (see below) easy to disrupt in hand-to-hand combat and thus give characters a reason to focus on quick back-and-forth moves.

Item 2: Action Types
All characters can take one Primary, one Secondary, and one Side action per turn. You can give up a Primary Action in favor of another Secondary action, and give up a Secondary action in favor of another Side action. Some actions will be labeled as "Immediate" (i.e. "Immediate Secondary Action). This means that you can take them at any point, even if it's not your currently your turn. If you've already used up that action for the current turn, you can still take an immediate action by expending your use of that action on your *next* turn.

Action Types:
-Most attacks and/or uses of bending are a Primary action. Same goes for most combat actions that require a skill check.
-A "Buildup" check is a secondary action. This is where you make a skill check, divide the result by five (rounding down), and add that as a bonus to your subsequent primary action. Possible buildups include an Acrobatics check to swing from the chandelier prior to making a flying kick or using earthbending to lift up a particularly huge boulder before you hurl it at someone. Alot of offensive bending moves will work best if you use a buildup action first, essentially allowing you to dedicate the results of two checks towards the same single attack and thus give that attack better odds of breaking through the enemy's defense.
-A defense check is an immediate secondary action. Normally, any skill check made against you- to attack you directly, sneak by you, deceive you, whatever- will compare the opponent's d10 roll+skill+modifiers against your skill+modifiers+5 (unless I change the die mechanic, but that's a matter for another post). A defense check lets you roll too, and use that result (if better) the next time you'd use your passive defense. It can also sometimes let you use different skills to defend.

(What all this means is that during most combat rounds you'll make a single attack, but must carefully decide just when and how you'll make your move- do I use my secondary action to Buildup my own attack or Defend against my opponent's move?)

-Skill checks that can be multitasked with relatively little effort (say, making a Manipulation check to lie to someone during a fight) can be done as a Side action, but carry a -2 penalty because you're not giving the task your full attention. You can't multitask an attack, that's always a Primary action.

Note that Buildup only lets you use a check as a boost to another check. You don't get the normal benefit. So if I actually need to make an Acrobatics check before I'm close enough to my opponent to kick them, I could do the acrobatics check as a Side action (with the -2 penalty) and also spend a Secondary action to make another Acrobatics check as buildup for my attack.

Item #3: Initative
During combat, your Initiative Count- i.e. the results of your initiative check- determines who goes first. When combat starts, everyone who's aware that it was about to start gets a free initiative check; otherwise, your count starts at 0, which means you have to spend a secondary action to reroll your initiative before you can do anything else.

I'm considering two different wrinkles I could add to this process. The first is having init checks be an *immediate* secondary action, meaning that you can try to act quickly and outdo your opponent that way. Remember Toph's first "fight" in the series? Against The Boulder?

Yeah, kinda like that.

The second wrinkle is to allow various things to modify someone's iniative count. Used as a cost for a bending technique, this would give me some nice leeway- and I'd definitely have it apply to anyone who gets a solid hit scored on them in combat, forcing them to "get their bearings" again (i.e. reroll initiative) before they can get back in the fight.

Item #4: Bending Faliures
Remember the time Toph tried to make a huge dirt cloud with Earthbending, then flubbed it and had to try again? No, because if someone screws up a bending attempt in Avatar it's either due to outside interference like being punched in the face, unexpected issues such as a solar eclipse, or them being an utter beginner. So what happens when you roll poorly on a bending check?

One of two things. Option A is to accept the poor result, which usually just means a relatively small-scale bending move. Option B is that the move takes longer. You take a Secondary action to reroll the check with a -1 penalty, and can use that result instead. This can go on for multiple turns so long as your character does nothing else and can keep concentrating on their bending, though the penalty on the check increases by 1 each time.

All right, I think that's that for now. As always, feedback is welcome; let me know if everything I'm describing makes sense, and whether or not it sounds like something you'd want to play.

Read all

Avatar RPG: Bending Styles

Here you are, as promised: a full breakdown of the different bending feats available, along with their prequisite skills. Anything with "Style" in the name denotes a 3-feat chain.

Waterbending:
-Core Style [Finesse]
-Polar Style [Athletics] (All manner of ice-related moves)
Shifting Moon Style [Dodge] (Lots to do with unbalancing others and pushing them around. Water whip, octopus style, and so on.)
-Foggy Swamp Bending [Stance] (Largely plant manipulation)
-Healing [minor advantage, Awareness]

Earthbending
-Core Style [Stance]
-Dai Li Style [Finesse] (Rock gloves and other moves the Dai Li seemed to specialize in)
-Burrowing Badgermole Style [Sense] (Burrowing, blindsight, and several other techniques Toph used much more than other people.)
-Metalbending [major advantage, Awareness]

Firebending
-Core Style [Hardiness]
-Blue Fire Style [minor advantage, Acrobatics] (This one might be split, making Blue Fire *just* an advantage and having Azula's array of fairly unique moves just another feat chain)
-Rage Style [Initiative] (Lots of offensive firebending moves, as seen with most fire nation mooks and Zuko in seasons 1 and 2.)
Lightning Bending [Discipline]
-Dancing Dragon Style [Athletics] (A more balanced array of techniques, including some decent defensive maneuvers.)

Airbending
-Core Style [Dodge]
-Soaring Sky Bison Style [Acrobatics] (mobility-focused moves, including the skills needed to use a glider)
-Hurricane Style [Discipline] (the sort of offensive moves Aang avoided)

Let me know what you think!

Read all

Avatar RPG: Bending and Character Creation

I mentioned in my initial post on this project that one priority here was a system that could easily accommodate homebrew bending styles. And obviously, representing different bending styles in general is going to be important here. You don't want all waterbenders to play the same, especially when one of avatar's strongest themes is the intertwining relationship between cultures and bending styles.

So here's how this Avatar RPG will represent bending styles: Three-feat chains. Taking yet another cue from my d20 Rethought project, bending styles will be represented by collections of feats that in turn each grant several bending techniques. Each style of bending will have a "core" 3-feat chain dealing with the simplest (though not always easiest) applications of a technique. And each bending style will have an associated skill as a prerequisite. For example, Earthbending Basics will require 2 ranks in Stance, Earthbending Expertise will require 3 ranks in Stance plus the character being at least level 4, and Earthbending Mastery will require the character having 4 ranks in Stance plus being at least level 7 (out of theoretical 'maximums' of 5 skill ranks and 10 levels).

As a side-note, I should credit Spycraft with the idea of giving feat chains a naming chain whose alphabetic order matches their heirarchy- all 3-feat chains will use the Basic-Expertise-Mastery naming method. There will also be some specialized applications of bending that require only a single feat (such as Lightning Bending for firebenders), as well as ones that also require a Major or Minor advantage just to take the feat (for bending uses that are considered rare talents, such as using waterbending to heal or wielding blue fire.

Last but not least, I plan to set a single feat aside specifically for making your own signature move, as an "in-between" for those who just want to be able to do something special on a reliable basis. Examples of a special move include Hugh's plant constructs and Iroh's lightning redirection.

To return to the original topic: this setup should make it very simple to write up balanced rules for whatever custom bending ideas you have in mind. An airbender who manipulates chakrams like guided missiles? A waterbender who learned a different style based around the concept of wearing down enemies through a sustained application of force? Go for it!

For the next post, I'll actually have a rough draft of the full list of the different bending styles the game will offer.

Art Credits: Image by z00tz00t.

Read all

Kingslayers: The Protagonists

Ta-daa! Here's the final results of the Kingslayers character creation thread. Like most of their defining aspects, the portraits were selected from a set of options presented for each character. On the whole, it seems like people's votes gave us a team of seasoned experts with a rather serious bent, rather than, say, a ragtag bunch of misfits. Which is not to say that the game won't have its humorous moments- I suspect that at least one member of the group will turn out to be quite a deadpan snarker. Still, we'll have to see how things go from here. . .assuming, of course, that I can be remotely on-task about this. I'm not going to lie, these personal storytelling projects are always some of the hardest things for me to stay committed to. Still, I'll keep you posted.

Art Credits: From left to right, Honesty Algebra, Makani, Eiji Kaneda, and unknown.

Read all

Kinglsayers: Character Archetypes

This was a fun little exercise, I have to say. Kinslayers' character creation process was meant to take the same flexible approach as the rest of the game: I suggest options for how to succeed, and the audience votes and/or suggests alternatives. In this case, I started with the 4 "roles" the 4 party members would be serving in, and then supplied a set of options for the forms that role could take.

The fun bit was that these roles- muscle, guide, investigator and negotiator- were decided on based on the needs of this particular plot, rather than the gameplay system or the genre. It gave me a chance to approach things from a different direction than having a tank, healer, artillery, and so on; an interesting first step in coming up with the characters for the game.

Muscle: While most of the party will presumably be decent in a fight, this will be the real go-to character when things get violent.

A: Killing Machine. Forget codes, forget honor. . .it'd be a stretch to even call this character a warrior. They've always been a prodigy at using violence to end the lives of others, simple as that.
B: Martial Artist. The character's dedication to mastering the arts of physical combat is almost an end in and of itself. They might be a monk, or just a disciplined swordsman with a spiritual side.
C: Tactician. This character's excellent situational awareness and decision-making skills have helped them lead many an outmatched group to victory.
D: Veteran Soldier. The character has held a variety of military occupations in his time. Surviving that kind of life requires a wide variety of skills that range far beyond just marching in proper formation and knowing how to hold a blade.

Investigator: Remember when I said the premise would be something like Sherlock Holmes pursuing Dracula? This fellow will be our closest thing to Sherlock Holmes.

A: Gumshoe. Classic Noir private detective. Will probably play the part to a shameless degree- trenchcoat, fedora, cigarette, the works.
B: Medium. A spiritualist with a limited array of inborn abilities, including the ability to "read" the memories of objects and perceive activity on the ethereal plane.
C: Profiler. An expert at reading people and predicting their behavior.
D: Scientist. Specializing in the realm of forensics, a realm of science that's achieved a moderate level of advancement in part thanks to divination magic; will probably be something of an artificer.

Negotiator: The party face, an expert at handling social obstacles.

A: Ambassador. The character's a veteran political mover and shaker, an expert at negotiating bureaucracies who always has a few strings he can pull.
B: Psychic. As telepaths go, his raw power is less than average, but his skill in wielding it makes him excellent at subtly manipulating people's minds.
C: Underworld Agent. An expert in working with those on the wrong side of the law, and perhaps in using various less-than-legal tactics himself.
D: Spy. An honest-to-goodness espionage operative, skilled in tradecraft and the art of deception.

Guide: The party will be visiting plenty of strange and exotic locales over the course of our story. They'll need someone to lead the way.

A: Adventurer. One of those crazy folks who makes a career out of going into very dangerous places and coming back with lots of loot.
B: Cosmopolitan. A well-traveled soul with plenty of experience when it comes to dealing with foreign cultures.
C: Tracker. An expert huntsman, whether his prey's an escaped fugitive or a dire wolf.
D: Savage. Born and raised by an "uncivilized" people, completely at home in the wild.

Tune in next time to see the characters /tg/ settled on!

Read all

Kingslayers

This one of those ideas that I've been sitting on for a while now. I'd like to try something along the lines of a certain innovative little story/game that transpired on 4chan's /tg/ sub-board back around the start of the year, called Ruby Quest. Like Ruby Quest, Kingslayers will be a game where a cast of player characters act according to the suggestion of the anonymous members of /tg/'s audience. But naturally, there'll be some wrinkles on the original formula. . .

Kingslayers will be set in D&D's Eberron campaign setting, with a core cast consisting of a 4-person adventuring party. The core plotline of the game will be one of mystery and investigation; Sherlock Holmes on the trail of Dracula as the villian pursues a dastardly plot taking him Around The World in Eighty Days.

The biggest difference between the format of this game and that of Ruby Quest is that I can't draw. At all. I'll be able to provide a variety of reference images, but for the most part we'll be dependent on my ability to set the scene via the written word, god help us all.

The other major difference will be that Kinglsayers is going to incorporate some significant game mechanics. Each of the 4 PCs will have a basic set of stats that read like the cliff notes of a D&D character, except that the numbers will instead be used in a die resolution system adapted from trigger discipline- so the dice will dictate the degree of the character's success as well as the factors that led to said success. The goal here is to keep things interesting. . .

More information to come soon.

Art Credits: Unknown, sadly.

Read all